On Pump vs Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)
On Pump vs Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)

On Pump vs Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)

  • Faculty: Program director Joseph Basha, CCP
  • Date: February 22nd, 2020 9:00 am
  • CEU’s: 0.78 CEUs
  • Price: $11.7
  • Category 1 SDCE CEU
Buy Course
Course Rating:
(2 Reviews)

Latest Reviews

View All

Course description

Excellent discussion forum debating the pros and cons of op-cab (Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) Vs. on pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG). 

Comprehensive Insights on On-Pump vs. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

In the continually evolving field of cardiac surgery, the debate between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a focal point of discussion. This recorded webinar, titled "On Pump vs. Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)," provides an in-depth exploration of this topic, offering a wealth of insights from seasoned surgeons and experts in cardiac care.

The Core Debate: On-Pump vs. Off-Pump CABG

The primary distinction between on-pump and off-pump CABG lies in the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machinery. On-pump CABG involves stopping the heart and diverting blood through a heart-lung machine, which maintains circulation and oxygenation during the procedure. In contrast, off-pump CABG is performed on a beating heart without the aid of CPB, aiming to reduce complications associated with the heart-lung machine.

Historical Perspectives and Surgical Preferences

Historically, the choice between on-pump and off-pump techniques has been influenced by a variety of factors including patient condition, surgeon expertise, and evolving clinical evidence. The webinar highlights that off-pump surgeries peaked around 2011, representing about 31% of CABG procedures. However, this approach has seen a decline, with current practices involving approximately 11% or less, mainly due to concerns about long-term graft patency and overall outcomes.

Analyzing Long-Term Outcomes

The webinar discusses a pivotal study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, which examined long-term outcomes of over 20,000 patients undergoing both on-pump and off-pump surgeries by surgeons specialized in their respective techniques. The findings suggest that while both methods have their merits, on-pump CABG may offer superior long-term graft patency and could be more appropriate for the majority of patients undergoing surgical revascularization.

Technical Challenges and Innovations

A significant portion of the webinar is dedicated to discussing the technical challenges associated with both techniques. For off-pump CABG, the challenges include maintaining stable hemodynamics and clear surgical fields on a beating heart. The experts discuss how advancements in surgical instruments and stabilizers have facilitated improvements in off-pump procedures, yet there remain concerns about the completeness of revascularization and the potential for early graft failure.

The Role of Surgeon Expertise and Patient Selection

The choice between on-pump and off-pump CABG is also heavily dependent on the surgeon’s expertise and comfort with each technique, as well as patient-specific factors. Patients with complex coronary artery disease, such as those with left main disease, three-vessel disease, or significant comorbidities, might benefit more from on-pump CABG due to the controlled environment it offers. Conversely, for patients at high risk from CPB, such as those with severe aortic calcification or compromised pulmonary function, off-pump CABG might be preferred to avoid the complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Implications for Clinical Practice

The webinar underscores the importance of a tailored approach to CABG, advocating for a patient-centered decision-making process. It emphasizes the necessity of ongoing research and data collection to further refine the guidelines and recommendations for selecting the optimal surgical approach for each individual patient.

Conclusion and Future Directions

In concluding, the webinar calls for a balanced view of both techniques, recognizing that the choice of on-pump vs. off-pump CABG should be guided by a comprehensive evaluation of patient anatomy, surgical risk, and expected outcomes. The discussion ends with a forward-looking statement about the need for innovation in surgical techniques and equipment to continue improving the safety and efficacy of CABG procedures.

By providing a detailed examination of on-pump versus off-pump CABG, this webinar serves as a crucial resource for cardiac surgeons, cardiology professionals, and medical trainees, enriching their understanding and helping to guide their clinical practices in this vital area of cardiovascular surgery.

 
#perfusion #perfusionist #CABG 
Register and watch for free @ https://library.perfusioneducation.com 
Please visit our sponsor links below: 

Meet Your Instructor

Program director Joseph Basha, CCP

Program director Joseph Basha, CCP

Joseph has been a practicing clinical perfusionist for 40 years. Joseph is the CEO of Houston Extracorporeal Technologies and is the program director of The New Orleans Conference

Read Full Bio